Reflections of Orthodox Participants

From the official Orthodox report of the 1991 WCC Assembly in Canberra

Webmaster Note: This document is hosted on the Orthodox Christian Information website for reference purposes only. We do not consider this document to accurately reflect a traditional Orthodox self-understanding, especially in the area of ecclesiology. See the other articles on the "References and Terms" page for comments on this, and other, reference texts hosted herein.

1. Introduction

The Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox delegates and participants at the seventh assembly of the World Council of Churches, meeting in Canberra, Australia, want to communicate with all in attendance through this statement in order to express to them some concerns. We preface our comments with an expression of appreciation to the World Council of Churches for its many contributions to the development of dialogue among churches, and to assisting all members in making efforts to overcome disunity. As Orthodox, we appreciate the assistance given over decades in the process of dialogue leading towards the full communion of Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches.

We also recognize the contributions of the WCC in the work it has done in its Commissions on Faith and Order and on Mission and Evangelism (CWME), its contribution to the Renewal of Congregational Life (RCL), its relief work through the Inter-Church Aid, Refugees and World Service (CICARWS), and in the Justice, Peace and the Integrity of Creation programme (JPIC).

Yet, our experience at this assembly has heightened a number of concerns that have been developing among the Orthodox since the last assembly. We want to share these with the Canberra assembly and to tell you where these are now leading us.

The Orthodox concern about these issues should not be understood as implying a reluctance to continue dialogue. The present statement is motivated not by disinterest or indifference towards our sisters and brothers in other churches and Christian communities, but by our sincere concern about the future of the ecumenical movement and of its goals and ideals, as they were formulated by its founders.

II. Orthodox concerns

1. The Orthodox churches want to emphasize that for them, the main aim of the WCC must be the restoration of the unity of the church. This aim does not exclude relating church unity with the wider unity of  humanity and creation. On the contrary, the unity of Christians will contribute more effectively to the unity of humanity and the world. Yet the latter must not happen at the expense of solving issues of faith and order, which divide Christians. Visible unity, in both the faith and the structure of the church, constitutes a specific goal and must not be taken for granted.

2. The Orthodox note that there has been an increasing departure from the Basis of the WCC. The latter has provided the framework for the World Council of Churches. Its text is: "The World Council of Churches is a fellowship of churches which confess the Lord Jesus Christ as God and Saviour according to scriptures and therefore seek to fulfill together their common calling to the glory of the one God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit" (Constitution). Should the WCC not direct its future work along these lines, it would be in danger of ceasing to be an instrument aiming at the restoration of Christian unity and in that case it would tend to become a forum for an exchange of opinions without any specific Christian theological basis. In such a forum, common prayer will be increasingly difficult , and eventually will become impossible, since even a basic common theological vision will be lacking.

3. The tendency to marginalize the Basis in WCC work has created some dangerous trends in the WCC. We miss from many WCC documents the affirmation that Jesus Christ is the world's Saviour. We perceive a growing departure from biblically-based Christian understanding of: (a) the Trinitarian God; (b) salvation; (c) the "good news" of the gospel itself ; (d) human beings as created in the image and likeness of God; and (e) the church, among others.

Our hope is that the results of Faith and Order work will find a more prominent place in the various expressions of the WCC, and that tendencies in the opposite direction will not be encouraged. The Orthodox, consequently, attribute special significance to the work of the Faith and Order Commission of the WCC, and view with concern each tendency to undermine its place in the structure of the Council.

4. The Orthodox follow with interest, but also with a certain disquiet, the developments of the WCC towards the broadening of its aims in the direction of relations with other religions. The Orthodox support dialogue initiatives, particularly those aiming at the promotion of relations of openness, mutual respect and human cooperation with neighbours of other faiths. When dialogue takes place, Christians are called to bear witness to the integrity of their faith. A genuine dialogue involves greater theological efforts to express the Christian message in ways that speak to the various cultures of our world. All this, however, must occur on the basis of theological criteria which will define the limits of diversity. The biblical faith in God must not be changed. The definition of these criteria is a matter of theological stud and must constitute the first priority of the WCC in view of its desired broadening of aims.

5. Thus, it is with alarm that the Orthodox have heard some presentations on the theme of this assembly. With reference to the theme of the assembly, the Orthodox still await the final texts. However, they observe that some people tend to affirm with very great ease the presence of the Holy Spirit in many movements and developments without discernment. The Orthodox wish to stress the factor of sin and error which exists in every human action, and separate the Holy Spirit from these. We must guard against a tendency to substitute a "private" spirit, the spirit of the world or other spirits for the Holy Spirit who proceeds from the Father and rests in the Son. Our tradition is rich in respect for local and national cultures, but we find it impossible to invoke the spirits of "earth, air, water and sea creatures". Pneumatology is inseparable from Christology or from the doctrine of the Holy Trinity confessed by the church on the basis of divine revelation.

6. The Orthodox are sorry that their position with regard to eucharistic communion has not been understood by many members of the WCC, who regard the Orthodox as unjustifiably insisting upon abstinence from eucharistic communion. The Orthodox once more invite their brothers and sisters in the WCC to understand that it is a matter of unity, in faith and fundamental Orthodox ecclesiology, and not a question of a triumphalistic stance.

For the Orthodox, the eucharist is the supreme expression of unity and not a means towards unity. The present situation in the ecumenical movement is for us an experience of the cross of Christian division. In this regard, the question of the ordination of women to the priestly and episcopal offices must also be understood within a theological and ecclesiological context.

7. Finally, our concern is also directed to the changing process of decision-making in the WCC. While the system of quotas has benefits, it may also be creating problems. As Orthodox we see changes that seem to increasingly weaken the possibility of an Orthodox witness in an otherwise Protestant international organization. We believe that this tendency is to the harm of the ecumenical effort.

8. For the Orthodox gathered at this assembly, these and other tendencies and developments question the very nature and identity of the Council, as described in the Toronto statement. In this sense the present assembly in Canberra appears to be a crucial point in the history of the ecumenical movement.

We must, therefore ask ourselves: Has the time come for the Orthodox churches and other member churches to review their relations with the World Council of Churches?

We pray the Holy Spirit to help all Christians to renew their commitment to visible unity.